3(29)

60 / 64

ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ
58
РЕФЛЕКСОТЕРАПИЯ И КОМПЛЕМЕНТАРНАЯ МЕДИЦИНА
№ 3 (29) 2019
nal of Animal Ethics. 2016. Vol. 6. No. 2. P.
123‑134.
4. Бочков А. Снова о разбавлениях // Наука.
Троицкийвариант.URL:
2011/12/06/snova-o-razbavleniyakh/.
5. Peralta P.D., Botija F.G., Martin C.C. Regu-
lating the Risks from Traditional Herbal Medi-
cine Resources and Herbal Supplements in the
EU – the Borderline Products // European
Food and Feed Law Review. 2016. Vol. 11. No.
4. P. 274‑289.
6. Write L. Magic Beans and Dragons: The war
against pseudoscience and misinformation //
Australian Quarterly. 2015. Vol. 86. No. 2. P.
10‑15.
7. Haller J., Jr. Shadow Medicine: The Placebo in
Conventional and Alternative Therapies. New
York: Columbia University Press, 2014. 288 p.
8. Shaw D.M. Homeopathy is where the harm
is: five unethical effects of funding unscientific
«remedies» // Journal of Medical Ethics. 2010.
Vol. 36. No. 3. P. 130‑131.
9. Science and Technology Committee – Fourth
Report. Evidence Check 2: Homeopathy // UK
Parliament. URL:
10.
cm200910/cmselect/cmsctech/45/4502.htm.
11. Viksveen P., Dymitr Z., Simoens S. Economic
evaluations of homeopathy: a review // The Eu-
ropean Journal of Health Economics. 2014. Vol.
15. No. 2. P. 157‑174.
12. Kmietowicz Z. Prince Charles delayed regu-
lation of herbal medicines // British Medical
Journal, Vol. 350. 11 May 2015‑17 May 2015.
13. Меморандум №2 Комиссии РАН по борь-
бе с лженаукой и фальсификацией научных
исследований «О лженаучности гомеопа-
тии» // Комиссия по борьбе с лженаукой
при Президиуме Российской академии
наук. 07.02.2017. URL:
/02/memorandum02‑homeopathy/.
14. Atwood K. Homeopathy and Evidence-Based
Medicine: Back to the Future – Part I // Sci-
ence BasedMedicine. 04.01.2008. URL: https://
sciencebasedmedicine.org/homeopathy-and-
evidence-based-medicine-back-to-the-future-
part-i/.
15. ШляпинА.,иер.Православнаяоценкагомео-
патии//СайтсвященникаАлексеяШляпина.
10.06.2016. URL:
kultizm/view/id/1193930.
16. Синезий, митр. Кассандрии. Гомеопа-
тия // Сектовед. Сайт о сектах, лжеуче-
ниях, и деструктивных культах. URL:
17. Siraisi N.G. History and histories in medical
texts // Nancy G. Siraisi. History, Medicine,
and the Traditions of Renaissance Learning.
Ann Arbour, MI: University of Michigan Press,
2007. P. 63‑105.
18. Hanuš L.O., Řezanka T., Spížek J., Dem-
bitsky V.M. Substances isolated from Man-
dragora species // Phytochemistry. 2005. Vol.
66. No. 20. P. 2408‑2417. DOI: 10.1016/j.
phytochem.2005.07.016.
19. Cash J. T. The Pharmacology Of The Alkaloids
Of Aconite (A. Napellus) // The British Medical
Journal. 1898. Vol. 2. No. 1971. P. 1041‑1042.
20. Cash J. T., Dunstan W. R. The Pharmacology of
Aconitine, Diacetylaconitine, Benzacomine and
Aconine considered in Relation to Their Chemi-
cal Constitution // Proceedings of the Royal So-
ciety of London. 1897‑1898. Vol. 62. P. 338‑347.
21. Speirs H. The Physiological Antagonism Be-
tween Aconite And Belladonna // The British
Medical Journal. 1908. Vol. 2. No. 2485. P. 372.
22. Hobbs Ch. St. John»s Wort – Ancient Herbal
Protector // Pharmacy in History. 1990. Vol. 32.
No. 4. P. 166‑169.
23. Lautenbach B. F. The Physiological Action of
Hemlock and Its Alkaloid // Proceedings of the
Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia.
1875. Vol. 27. No. 2. P. 367‑399.
24. Sullivan J. A Note on the Death of Socrates //
The Classical Quarterly. 2001. Vol. 51. No. 2. P.
608‑610.
25. Smith W.D. Notes on ancient medical histori-
ography // Bulletin of the History of Medicine.
1989. Vol. 63. No. 1. P. 73‑109.
26. Clark M. E., Summers K.M. Hippocratic Med-
icine and Aristotelian Science in the «Daemo-
num investigatio peripatetica» of Andrea Ce-
salpino // Bulletin of the History of Medicine.
1995. Vol. 69. No. 4. P. 527‑541.
27. Browner C.H. Criteria for Selecting Herbal
Remedies // Ethnology. 1985. Vol. 24. No. 1. P.
13‑32.
28. Benzenhöfer U. Zum Brief des Johannes Opori-
nus über Paracelsus: Die bislang älteste bekannte
Briefüberlieferung in einer «Oratio»von Gerva-
sius Marstaller // Sudhoffs Archiv. 1989. Bd. 73.
H. 1. P. 55‑63.
29. Medicus F., Marti F. The scientific significance
of Paracelsus // Bulletin of the Institute of the
History of Medicine. 1936. Vol. 4. No. 5. P.
353‑366.
30. Rosner E. Hohenheims Bergsuchtmonographie
// Medizinhistorisches Journal. 1981. Bd. 16. H.
1/2. Kreatur und Kosmos: Internationale Be-
iträge zur Paracelsusforschung. P. 20‑52.
31. Multhaue R. Medical chemistry and «The Para-
celsians» // Bulletin of the History of Medicine.
1954. Vol. 28. No. 2. P. 101‑126.